- It's likely that the tryBranch is returning false when it should be returning true, make these logs more verbose so they show up on production logs.
Co-authored-by: Gusted <williamzijl7@hotmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/pages-server/pulls/127
Reviewed-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
- Add the host to the Handler's logging fields, so you don't just see the path, but also which domain was being requested.
Co-authored-by: Gusted <williamzijl7@hotmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/pages-server/pulls/123
Reviewed-by: 6543 <6543@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
- Actually log useful information at their respective log level.
- Add logs in hot-paths to be able to deep-dive and debug specific requests (see server/handler.go)
- Add more information to existing fields(e.g. the host that the user is visiting, this was noted by @fnetX).
Co-authored-by: Gusted <williamzijl7@hotmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/pages-server/pulls/116
Reviewed-by: 6543 <6543@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
So we can access branch that contain slash like `branch/name` with `username.codeberg.page/repo/@branch~name/`.
Branch name cannot contain `~` character but it can be in a HTTP URL, so replace the `~` from URL to `/` could be a valid solution to me.
Resolve#101
Co-authored-by: Gary Wang <wzc782970009@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/pages-server/pulls/102
Reviewed-by: 6543 <6543@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gary Wang <blumia@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: Gary Wang <blumia@noreply.codeberg.org>
The header is not only necessary on the OPTIONS request, but on any method, so I removed the condition.
Serving any workadventure map was broken BTW. We should have tested this :-(
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/pages-server/pulls/69
Reviewed-by: Andreas Shimokawa <ashimokawa@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Otto Richter <otto@codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: Otto Richter <otto@codeberg.org>
